Re: efficiency of let used in a binding

From: Keith Wright <>
Date: Tue, 21 Oct 97 19:43 EDT

> There is some disagreement about what define means when it is not
> at the top level.

Really, what is the problem? I thought R4RS section 5.2.2 had
it covered by exhibiting the equivalent (letrec ..) form.

There _is_ disagreement over what (load ..) means when it is
inside a binding form. <Opinion suppressed>

This mail message sent by GNU emacs and Linux.
Power to the people. Linux is here.
Food, Shelter, Source code.
Received on Wed Oct 22 1997 - 00:43:27 CEST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Mon Jul 21 2014 - 19:38:59 CEST