Re: Scheme bug in internal define

From: Jim Blandy <>
Date: Sun, 9 Nov 1997 16:41:12 -0500

> Oh good grief, I _know_ the program isn't R4RS, that's why I said
>"or display error message." Reject the program if you must, but
>substuting one variable for a different one without a message is
>no good.

The Guile behavior you've demonstrated is bizarre. I don't
particularly wish to support that code, but I agree that the system
should complain, rather than doing something incomprehensible.
Received on Sun Nov 09 1997 - 22:38:16 CET

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Mon Jul 21 2014 - 19:38:59 CEST